Investors will recall the old adage that when the US sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold. February’s sell-off kept true to form, with equity markets in Europe, Japan and emerging markets all following the S&P 500 index of US equities down after higher-than-expected US wage growth data raised the spectre of rising inflation.

In our view, one of the remarkable things about February’s sell-off was not the return of volatility after its long absence, but rather how far emerging markets stood up to scrutiny and held the line in terms of performance. Their 10.2% decline from peak to trough in January and February almost exactly mirrored the S&P 500, Nikkei 225, FTSE 100 and Euronext 100 indices.[1] In previous sell-offs, emerging markets were often the hardest hit by spikes in volatility, but this time things were different.

One reason for this, we think, is that there have been positive changes across emerging markets since 2013’s ‘taper tantrum’ which serve to shore up emerging economies against external shocks and adverse global financial conditions. These changes include the relative absence of emerging-market/US-dollar currency pegs, reduced foreign debt, lower rates of inflation, lower current-account deficits, and currency adjustments.

Of these, the reduction in US-dollar pegs is possibly the most significant. Historically, negative cycles would follow a well-worn path: confronted with a spike in volatility, an emerging-market country would deploy its foreign-exchange reserves to defend its currency and maintain its US-dollar peg. Eventually, the rate of attrition in these reserves would become unsustainable, forcing a devaluation and the printing of new currency to service existing debt (often denominated in far more expensive US dollars). This, in turn, would lead to a domestic inflationary spiral and finally a default on that US-dollar debt.

Now, with far fewer emerging markets pegging their currencies to the US dollar, and with a surge in local-currency bond issuance,[2] this cycle has been broken. This means that the old correlations of emerging to developed markets are no longer the same, even if they are often still widely assumed.

Beyond currency pegs, though, other factors underline a change in emerging markets. Consider the composition of emerging-market indices, for example. Before the financial crisis in the mid-2000s, energy and materials stocks comprised close to 40% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. This has now fallen to about15%, with technology overtaking these sectors, thus reducing the influence of commodity-intensive stocks on the index.

Political risk too offers a changing dynamic. Where once it was perhaps fair to assign a far higher level of political risk to emerging markets, it is our belief that something of an equalisation of political risk is being seen in select developed markets. Nevertheless, emerging markets still trade at a wide discount to their developed counterparts, with a cyclically-adjusted Shiller (10-year average) price-to-earnings ratio of just 13x, versus the US equivalent of 24x.[3]

Even if investors haven’t fully woken up to it yet, we think these factors add up to a new reality. Increasingly, we believe, emerging capital markets can thrive on their own terms with far less reference to the S&P 500 or other developed capital markets, so long as the real economies remain supported. For now, this seems to be the case. During four out of the last six US rate-rise cycles, for example, emerging markets have continued to rise.

Looking to the future, we remain optimistic about emerging markets, although we acknowledge how differentiated the opportunity set is at the individual country, sector and stock levels. For now, we see interesting opportunities in areas such as health care, e-commerce and sectors related to electric vehicles, as we maintain a focus on companies offering solid operating cash flows over a five-year period, and sustainable balance sheets.

Overall, we continue to see strong structural growth stories in emerging markets, underpinned by structural thematic trends, which we believe are not too vulnerable to derailment by changes in equity-market sentiment or headline macroeconomic data.


[1] Source: Bloomberg, based on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, US-dollar terms, 26 January-9 February 2018. All other indices in US-dollar terms.

[2] Well over 80% of total outstanding emerging-market debt is denominated in local currencies. Source: Business Insider: ‘Global debt has hit an eye-watering $215 trillion’, 5 April 2018.

[3] Source: Newton, as at 14 March 2018.


Newton equity opportunities team

Newton equity opportunities team

The team who manage our equity opportunities strategies


Your email address will not be published.

Newton does not capture and store any personal information about an individual who accesses this blog, except where he or she volunteers such information, whether via email, an electronic form or other means. Where personal information is supplied, it will be used only in relation to this blog, and will not be collected or stored for any other purpose. Comments submitted via the blog are moderated, and, as a result, there may be a delay before they are posted.

This is a financial promotion. Any reference to a specific country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell investments in those countries or sectors. Please note that holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice. Compared to more established economies, the value of investments in emerging markets may be subject to greater volatility, owing to differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic, political instability or less developed market practices.

Explore topics